Ok

En poursuivant votre navigation sur ce site, vous acceptez l'utilisation de cookies. Ces derniers assurent le bon fonctionnement de nos services. En savoir plus.

05/07/2011

LIFE AS CREAL, SOCIETY AS ORTHOPOïESIS

Capture d’écran 2011-07-05 à 11.13.33.png



Crealist philosophy developped by Luis de Miranda in his various
books, non-fiction and novels, renames the vital flow as the Creal, an
ever creative and mostly invisible immanent process, metamorphosis of
all the possibles, from wich the humans actualize, on a recurrent
basis, a minimal part in order to shape an habitable territory, the
realities. Our coded realities are created, and being human is being a
technological animal.

The crealities that allow us to survive are systems of shapes. Those
shapes are formed by our labelization, a naming that creates a
framing. Since the first satellite Sputnik was launched on space in
1957 the hypothesis of Gaïa is no longer a speculation : the earth has
become an individual, and therefore we can consider it as our ever
transforming work of art.

Numerism and crealism have always been the dialectical crescendo of
humanity : we name, calculate, organize, and even our nature is now
the result of a technology of transformation. But in order not to
become coded robots, technological zombies, automatons, we need to
keep a fidelity to the vital forces of the Creal, wich nourrished our
poïetical capacities. If History is an orthopoïesis, we have to
explain how certain places of the Creal tend to become technical, or,
in other words : why are there forms or a spiritual perception of
forms ? Why does life needs realities ? Crealism stance that some places (forces) of the Creal tend to impose their direction, and this momentanuous thrives (pushes of direction), create realities. 

11:14 | Lien permanent | Commentaires (0) | |  Facebook | |  Imprimer

Les commentaires sont fermés.